Online Purchase of "Cashmere Sweaters" Turns Out to Be "Wool Sweaters"? A Suzhou Consumer's Struggle for Redress and an Examination of E-commerce Platform Responsibility

Online Purchase of "Cashmere Sweaters" Turns Out to Be "Wool Sweaters"? A Suzhou Consumer's Struggle for Redress and an Examination of E-commerce Platform ResponsibilityRecently, Mr. Qi, a resident of Suzhou, purchased two sweaters labeled as "100% cashmere" from an e-commerce platform

Online Purchase of "Cashmere Sweaters" Turns Out to Be "Wool Sweaters"? A Suzhou Consumer's Struggle for Redress and an Examination of E-commerce Platform Responsibility

Recently, Mr. Qi, a resident of Suzhou, purchased two sweaters labeled as "100% cashmere" from an e-commerce platform. However, professional testing revealed they were actually "100% wool," leading to a consumer rights dispute. This incident highlights the quality risks associated with online cashmere purchases and the shortcomings of e-commerce platforms in protecting consumer rights. This article will detail Mr. Qi's experience seeking redress and delve into the responsibilities and response strategies of e-commerce platforms in such cases.

The Incident: The Truth Behind 188 Yuan "Cashmere Sweaters"

On November 2nd, Mr. Qi purchased two sweaters from a shop named "Lumei Yang Cashmere Sweaters" on an e-commerce platform for 188 yuan each. The product information clearly stated the fabric material as "100% cashmere." Upon receiving the items, however, Mr. Qi found the sweaters to be scratchy, significantly different from the texture he expected from cashmere. Despite multiple communications with the merchant's customer service, Mr. Qi received no satisfactory explanation; the customer service representative even claimed that "the more you wear them, the softer they become."

Suspecting the product quality, Mr. Qi, at the suggestion of the e-commerce platform's customer service, sent the sweaters to the National Wool and Knitwear Quality Inspection and Testing Center (Zhejiang) in Tongxiang, Jiaxing, Zhejiang Province for testing. This institution is a national-level legally authorized technical institution authorized by the State Administration for Market Regulation. On November 18th, the test report revealed that the fiber content of Mr. Qi's submitted garments was "100% wool," completely contradicting the merchant's claim of "100% cashmere."

The Vast Price Difference Between Cashmere and Wool

According to media reports, cashmere costs 700 to 800 yuan per kilogram, while wool costs only 2 to 3 yuan per kilogram a price difference of hundreds of times. Mr. Qi's purchase of "cashmere sweaters" that were actually "wool sweaters" constitutes a grave infringement of consumer rights and is blatant fraud. This incident also reflects the uneven quality of cashmere products on the market, presenting significant challenges to consumer rights protection.

The Platform's Response and Consumer Dissatisfaction

Mr. Qi provided the test report to the e-commerce platform. The platform's customer service stated that the merchant also provided a test report showing 100% cashmere, but the platform still agreed to refund Mr. Qi. However, Mr. Qi expressed strong dissatisfaction with this resolution. Because the testing required sampling, both sweaters were cut for testing, leaving Mr. Qi with neither the product nor compensation for transportation and testing fees. Mr. Qi demanded that the platform compensate him according to the "triple compensation" principle stipulated in the Consumer Rights Protection Law, and reimburse him for transportation, testing, and lost wages. However, this request remains unmet.

The platform's "refund-only" approach failed to quell the consumer's anger. For consumers, this is not merely a monetary loss but also a betrayal of trust. As a trading platform, the platform has a responsibility to protect consumer rights; a simple refund is insufficient to compensate for the consumer's losses and emotional distress.

A Lengthy Path to Consumer Redress

Mr. Qi filed complaints with the Shanghai 12315 consumer complaint hotline and the 12345 hotline. He also reported the matter to the 12315 hotline in Xingtai City, Hebei Province. The local authorities have recorded the complaint and stated they will contact Mr. Qi again.

The reporter contacted the e-commerce platform multiple times. Customer service responded that if consumers provide their own test reports, the platform will use those as a basis. Regarding Mr. Qi's dispute, the platform stated it was conducting further verification and testing. However, the platform's response lacked proactiveness and failed to effectively resolve the consumer's issues.

Suspicious Merchant Information: Suspected Misrepresentation

Mr. Qi mentioned that the shop name "Lumei Yang Cashmere Sweaters" includes "Ordos City," which could mislead consumers into believing the merchant is a legitimate manufacturer from Ordos City. However, the merchant is actually registered in Qinghe County, Xingtai City, Hebei Province, a region known for its cashmere distribution, but this does not guarantee product quality. Mr. Qi believes the merchant is engaging in potentially misleading practices. Repeated attempts to contact the merchant by phone went unanswered.

Intervention of the Market Supervision Department of Qinghe County, Hebei

The reporter contacted the Xingtai Municipal Market Supervision Bureau hotline. Staff stated that consumers who purchase allegedly substandard cashmere sweaters from businesses registered in Qinghe County can file a complaint with the Xingtai 12315 hotline. Complaints are forwarded to the Qinghe County Market Supervision Bureau for verification, then further routed to the regulatory office in the merchant's area to contact the merchant, investigate, and implement subsequent penalties.

Currently, Mr. Qi has reported the matter to the Xingtai 12315 hotline in Hebei Province. Local authorities have recorded the complaint and stated they will contact Mr. Qi again.

E-commerce Platform Responsibilities and Response Strategies

This incident reveals shortcomings in the e-commerce platform's product quality supervision and consumer rights protection. The platform has a responsibility to rigorously vet merchants, ensure accurate product information, and establish a robust product quality monitoring mechanism. For consumer complaints, the platform should respond proactively and take effective measures to resolve disputes, rather than simply issuing refunds. The platform should enhance communication and coordination with consumers and merchants to facilitate problem-solving and maintain a fair and equitable trading environment.

Challenges and Suggestions for Consumer Rights Protection

Mr. Qi's struggle for redress highlights the numerous difficulties faced by consumers in online shopping. Consumers bear time costs, financial costs, and even psychological stress during the redress process. Strengthening consumer rights protection requires the concerted efforts of government agencies, e-commerce platforms, and consumers. Government agencies should strengthen supervision and improve relevant laws and regulations; e-commerce platforms should enhance self-discipline and improve consumer protection mechanisms; and consumers should raise their awareness of rights protection and actively safeguard their legitimate rights and interests.

Conclusion: Continued Monitoring and Protection of Consumer Rights

Mr. Qi's experience is not an isolated case. It reminds consumers to be vigilant when shopping online, carefully choose merchants and products, and retain relevant evidence. E-commerce platforms should also actively assume responsibility and establish comprehensive consumer redress mechanisms to protect consumers' legitimate rights and interests. This case will continue to be monitored, and we expect relevant authorities to provide a resolution promptly, offering guidance for similar incidents, maintaining a fair and equitable market environment, and effectively protecting consumer rights.

Disclaimer: The content of this article is sourced from the internet. The copyright of the text, images, and other materials belongs to the original author. The platform reprints the materials for the purpose of conveying more information. The content of the article is for reference and learning only, and should not be used for commercial purposes. If it infringes on your legitimate rights and interests, please contact us promptly and we will handle it as soon as possible! We respect copyright and are committed to protecting it. Thank you for sharing.(Email:[email protected])