The three major operators frequently establish subsidiaries, hiding two major issues behind them!

In recent years, the three major operators have all established many new subsidiaries,In the past, I used to count carefully and regularly, but now I can't even count it,Every now and then, a new subsidiary is established,Research and development, operation, and integration of research and operation,Internally, externally,Sole proprietorship, joint venture,With a registered capital of tens of billions and tens of millions,Overall, I think this is a good thing,In the past, operators were limited by their business scope and policy restrictions, and could only adapt to changes with no change,As a result, when we entered the mobile The Internet Age, we were hit by a combination of fists and lost three souls,Now that restrictions have weakened, we can more flexibly implement strategic planning and respond to market competition,But there are two key issues,The first question,At present, the three major operators have established new subsidiaries, and their original employees are still the ones who basically work,Transfer a group of people from within, from leaders to core cadres, basically elderly operators,To be honest, this may seem efficient, but in reality, the consequences are numerous,As they are all elderly operators, this directly leads to the fact that the operating mechanism and corporate culture of new enterprises are basically the continuation of the operator's mechanism,The results of operating internet and new digital services through the mechanism of an operator can be imagined,One approval process and procurement process can drive people crazy.Also, the elderly operators occupy various management and backbone positions in the new company,In terms of practical work ability, one often exhibits a lack of talent, leading to frequent internal conflicts,Especially the senior leadership team of the company, who were originally supposed to lead the new company in the new field, acted like fools in the face of real market competition,I didn't embellish it, I have truly seen many real cases and a bunch of wonderful stories

In recent years, the three major operators have all established many new subsidiaries,

In the past, I used to count carefully and regularly, but now I can't even count it,

Every now and then, a new subsidiary is established,

Research and development, operation, and integration of research and operation,

Internally, externally,

Sole proprietorship, joint venture,

With a registered capital of tens of billions and tens of millions,

Overall, I think this is a good thing,

In the past, operators were limited by their business scope and policy restrictions, and could only adapt to changes with no change,

As a result, when we entered the mobile The Internet Age, we were hit by a combination of fists and lost three souls,

Now that restrictions have weakened, we can more flexibly implement strategic planning and respond to market competition,

But there are two key issues,

The first question,

At present, the three major operators have established new subsidiaries, and their original employees are still the ones who basically work,

Transfer a group of people from within, from leaders to core cadres, basically elderly operators,

To be honest, this may seem efficient, but in reality, the consequences are numerous,

As they are all elderly operators, this directly leads to the fact that the operating mechanism and corporate culture of new enterprises are basically the continuation of the operator's mechanism,

The results of operating internet and new digital services through the mechanism of an operator can be imagined,

One approval process and procurement process can drive people crazy.

Also, the elderly operators occupy various management and backbone positions in the new company,

In terms of practical work ability, one often exhibits a lack of talent, leading to frequent internal conflicts,

Especially the senior leadership team of the company, who were originally supposed to lead the new company in the new field, acted like fools in the face of real market competition,

I didn't embellish it, I have truly seen many real cases and a bunch of wonderful stories.

For example, recently I have heard many wonderful stories about a certain operator's cloud company. When I have time, I can choose something to tell,

Soldiers bear a bear, but nesting a bear can sometimes be very frustrating.

The second question,

In recent years, operators have built many new subsidiaries, and objectively speaking, many of them have played a certain role,

However, a considerable portion of them have lost value due to unclear strategic orientation, overlapping responsibilities, outdated hotspots, and other reasons, but it seems that they have never been eliminated,

Simply put, it is: just care about life, care about nurturing, care about teaching, care about death, care about burying!

The ultimate result is that a bunch of so-called professional companies are like a parasitic plant attached to the mother's body, sucking blood,

Where does the blood come from? Only from the provincial operating companies, as they are the only ones that are profitable,

And where does the profit of the provincial company come from? That's all the blood and sweat of hundreds of thousands of grassroots employees!

Why not shut down subsidiaries that have lost value and have never played a role?

On the one hand, it is a problem of employment. If the company is shut down, how can we solve the employment problems of those employees? This is a key issue.

On the other hand, it is also a key issue of who will bear the responsibility for decision-making errors, such as company shutdowns, investment failures, and loss of state-owned assets. Who will bear this responsibility and whether accountability is needed.

But I believe that it is even more irresponsible to continue letting those companies that should die and continue to suck blood.

This requires decision-making courage.

I personally believe that the professional company system of operators needs a round of major integration.

Disclaimer: The content of this article is sourced from the internet. The copyright of the text, images, and other materials belongs to the original author. The platform reprints the materials for the purpose of conveying more information. The content of the article is for reference and learning only, and should not be used for commercial purposes. If it infringes on your legitimate rights and interests, please contact us promptly and we will handle it as soon as possible! We respect copyright and are committed to protecting it. Thank you for sharing.(Email:[email protected])